ABSTRACT
Objectives: Varicella is common infectious disease mainly in childhood, usually is a mild, self-limited illness and complications are usually rare. The incubation period for this disease is generally 14- 16 days but may vary from 7 to 21 days. Varicella in the adults with comorbidities or immunosuppressed children may be severe and prolonged with complications. Method(s): A case report of a 6-year-old girl hospitalized for new-onset manifestations of disseminated vesicular exanthema, the manifestations of which occurred mainly on the chest, back, capillitium, oral cavity, and genital area. The child was suffering from abdominal, knee and lumbosacral pain at that time. The patient's history revealed that 10 days prior to the cutaneous manifestations, she had influenza with bronchopneumonia requiring oxygen therapy, steroids and antibiotics. Result(s): The condition progressed within 48 h, complicated by the development of multi-organ failure, coagulopathy with the development of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy over the course of antiviral, antibiotic and antifungal therapy. Laboratory parameters included high elevation of C-reactive protein, il-6, leukocytosis, neutrophilia and highly elevated liver enzymes. Varicella infection was confirmed by detection of herpes zoster virus - polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from vesicles. The patient received intravenous immunoglobulin therapy at a dose of 2 g/L and fresh frozen plasma, thrombocyte concentrate. The girl was intubated with analogization. Laboratory parameters subsequently revealed high anti CoV-2 positivity, high CoV-2 IgG positivity and negative CoV-2 IgM. The patient's condition did not preclude the course of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) corticosteroids were added to the treatment at a dose of 1 mg/kg weight. Patient's condition stabilized after 1 month. Discussion(s): Our case report presents an example of fulminant complicated life-threatening course of varicella. Even in common respiratory infections, we must think about the risk and consequences of coinfections and post-infectious complications such as in our case especially influenza and COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Objective: COVID-19 caused a deleterious impact on the health care system globally.The roll out of vaccines seems to be the only effective way to curtail the spread of disease.The purpose of this study is to assess the dermatological adverse effect of post COVID-19vaccination on a gender basis. Methodology: This was an observational,cross-sectional,questionnaire-based survey conducted in Pakistan.The sample comprises 518 participants. The questionnaire was self-designed. The trial lasted six months, from August 1, 2022, until January 31, 2023. We used a non-probability sampling technique.Dermatological adverse effects like burning pain, redness, rashes, and lymphadenopathy at the injection site were recorded.Fever was also noted. All the participants have received booster shots or double doses of any one of CCOVID-19 vaccines, such as AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Sinovac, Sinopharm,Pakvac, etc. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Qualitative data was reported as frequency and percentage, and quantitativedata was reported as standard deviation and mean. Result(s): The study included 518 subjects, of whom 262 were males and 256 were females. The mean age of male is 42.70+/-14.05 years and female is 39.04+/-14.6years with a significant difference observed between them (p=0.004). The most common complaint among dermatological adverse effects after first was pain. 106(40.5%) male and 132(51.6%) female reported painwith a significant difference observed between them (p=0.011) followed by swelling which was reported by 92(35.1%) males and 120(46.9%) females with a significant difference observed between them (p=0.006).Burning was reported in 92(35.1%) male and 148(57.8%) female with a significant difference observed between them(p<0.001). Fever was also quite commonly reported in both male 116(44.3%) and female 178(69.5%) with significantdifference observed between them (p<0.001),Likewise post 2nd dose of vaccination, pain was most commonly noted in 90(34.4%) male and female 124(48.4%) female with significant difference observed between them (p=0.001). Moreover, burning was reported by 80(30.5%) malesand 132(51.6%) females with a significant difference observed between them (p<0.001). rashes were reported by76(29.0%) males and 100(39.1%) females with a significant difference observed between them (p=0.016), lymphadenopathy was also significantly associated with genders, (p<0.001). Conclusion(s): This study concluded that the burning pain,redness,rashes,and lymphadenopathywere the most prevalent side effects in male and female post 1st and 2ndCOVID-19 vaccination.Furthermore fever was also reported in majority of subjects.In addition to this higher percentage of side effects were recorded in females as comparedto males.Copyright © 2023 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Mucocutaneous eruptions are associated with many viral processes and present as erythema multiforme (EM), reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption (RIME), Stevens Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN). Limited reports have described the association of COVID-19 and mucocutaneous eruptions in children and adults to date. Method(s): This was a multicenter descriptive case series performed at six tertiary medical centers. Inclusion required a clinical diagnosis of EM, RIME, SJS or TEN and a positive COVID-19 test (rapid antigen or PCR) less than 4 weeks prior to onset of dermatologic manifestation. Data was collected at time of each patient encounter. Result(s): A total of 7 patients met criteria and had a median age of 15 years for pediatric patients (<18 years of age) and 36 years for adult patients (>18 years of age). Patients were found to have a diagnosis of RIME in 85.7% of cases. Oral mucosal involvement was the most common clinical finding (100%), followed by ocular (57.1%), urogenital (57.1%) and skin (42.9%) involvement. 71.4% of cases required hospitalization for their cutaneous eruption. No patients died from their inflammatory condition. Discussion(s): This case series highlights the development of mucocutaneous eruptions in association with COVID-19 infection. Within our cohort, RIME was the most commonly identified COVID-associated eruption. These findings provide additional evidence that abnormalities in host immune response to viral pathogens play a role in severe mucocutaneous blistering conditions. Further investigation will aid our understanding of this disease to improve diagnostics and advance targeted treatments for patients in the future.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Chilblain lupus erythematosus (LE) is a rare chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE) characterized by the appearance of violaceous plaques in acral regions most exposed to cold. The isolated form affects middle-aged women, while the familial form manifests in early childhood and is associated with mutations in the TREX1 gene. Result(s): A 13-year-old adolescent, with no relevant family history, was referred in March 2021 for suspected chilblain-like lesions associated with COVID-19 infection. The patient presented with multiple violaceous papules on hands and feet. The lesions were slightly painful. Small hyperkeratotic papules were also observed on finger pads. Physical examination also revealed some aphthae affecting the lips. No other systemic symptoms were reported. A skin biopsy and blood tests were performed due to presumed chilblain LE with probable systemic involvement. Histology revealed basal vacuolar damage and intense perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic inflammatory dermal infiltrate. Remarkably, mucin was noted among the collagen bundles. Leukopenia and positive ANA antibodies (titre 1:320) were detected. Complement levels were normal. SARS-CoV2 infection was ruled out. Skin lesions disappeared within 1 month under topical corticosteroids. Hydroxychloroquine was afterwards started by Rheumatology without recurrence of skin symptoms until last follow-up. Discussion(s): We present an uncommon case of an adolescent with systemic LE presenting as chilblain LE. Chilblain LE can be accompanied by other discoid CCLE. It can progress to systemic LE in up to 20% of patients, especially when concomitant CCLE is present. This rare presentation of CCLE should be differentiated from typical chilblain and other resembling lesions, such as SARS-CoV2-associated chilblain and acral purpuric lesions (COVID toes). The Mayo Clinic diagnostic criteria can be helpful, particularly in this last SARS-CoV2 outbreak scenario, when the reporting of similar skin lesions has been significant.
ABSTRACT
Las manifestaciones cutáneas relacionadas a la infección por el coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, causante de COVID-19, se han descrito entre el 0,2% y 20,4% de las personas que cursan con esta enfermedad. Las más frecuentemente descritas son: lesiones maculopapulares (47%), lesiones acrales eritematosas con vesículas o pústulas (pseudoperniosis) (19%), urticariales (19%), lesiones vesiculosas (9%) y livedo/necrosis (6%). En particular, la pitiriasis rosada es una dermatosis autolimitada de etiología desconocida, sin embargo, se ha visto asociada a la infección por SARS-CoV-2, con algunos reportes de casos en la literatura. El mecanismo fisiopatológico de las lesiones cutáneas en COVID-19 no es claro, y se han planteado algunas teorías, entre las cuales está el papel que juega la enzima convertidora de angiotensina 2 (ACE2) utilizada por el virus para infectar las células, los infiltrados linfocíticos, los depósitos de factores del complemento en la piel, y la reactivación de virus latentes como los herpes virus humanos. Se presenta el caso de una paciente con pitiriasis rosada asociada a COVID-19 y se describen los casos reportados hasta la fecha
Subject(s)
Humans , Pityriasis Rosea , Skin , Skin Manifestations , Urticaria , Coronavirus , Exanthema , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19ABSTRACT
COVID-19 is a multisystem disease that requires holistic management. Most patients will experience mild symptoms including cough, fever and mild dyspnoea. A small proportion of patients will have severe manifestations including respiratory failure, ARDS and multiorgan failure. Extrapulmonary features are common and include gastrointestinal, thromboembolic, neurological, cardiac, renal, endocrine and dermatological manifestations. The care of COVID-19 patients requires close attention to these features. This includes respiratory support (such as supplemental oxygen, NIV and awake proning);fluid, electrolyte and nutrition management;prevention, detection and treatment of thrombotic events;management of diabetic complications;review of medications;appropriate use of antibiotics;and evidence-based use of therapeutic agents such as corticosteroids, antivirals such as remdesivir and other emerging therapies such as immunomodulating agents. Early planning for treatment escalation and decision making around the appropriateness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation are crucial as deterioration can be rapid. Prolonged symptoms occur in a minority of patients and longitudinal follow-up is required.Copyright © ERS 2021.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused thousands of deaths since it was declared as a pandemic. Recently it continues to be one of the most followed topics in the world in terms of its course and treatment. Favipiravir is a broad-spectrum anti-viral agent that has been shown to be effective against various Coronaviruses in vitro. However, as with any drug use, side effects may develop with the use of favipravir treatment. Case Report: We reported a 55-year-old female patient with acute urticarial with angioedema whom had COVID-19 pneumonia. She had no history of allergy, atopy, previous similar episodes or family history of hereditary angioedema. There is no drug or food consumption that may be suspicious in terms of allergy described by the patient other than favipravir. Conclusion(s): As far as we know, it is the first case reported from our country. Since there is no specific examination for differential diagnosis, we cannot distinguish as a rare side effect due to favipiravir treatment or COVID-19 cutaneous manifestation. As a result, studies involving more cases of COVID-19 skin findings are needed.© Copyright 2020 by Emergency Physicians Association of Turkey.
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of symptoms of post-COVID syndrome by means of a questionnaire among medical university employees. Material and methods. From March 2021 to February 2022, an anonymous online survey was conducted at the A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. Only 313 fully completed questionnaires were selected for analysis. Results and discussion. A wide range of asthenic, infectious-inflammatory, respiratory, cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric, gastroenterological and dermatological symptoms were noted both during the peak period and during the convalescence of COVID-19. According to the subjective data of respondents, for more than 3 months, various symptoms associated with deterioration of health after recovering from a new coronavirus infection persisted in 25.9% of cases. Within 3-6 months after the illness and more than 6 months, 44.6% and 55.4% of respondents noted the presence of symptoms of post-COVID syndrome, respectively. During the analysis, it was found that with an increase in the volume of lung damage according to CT data, there was a tendency to increase the proportion of respondents with a long-term (more than 6 months) persistent symptoms of post-COVID syndrome from 20% with CT score 0, up to 29% with CT score 1-2 and up to 58% with CT score 3-4. In this regard, apparently, it is necessary to develop additional screening programs as part of the medical examination of COVID-19 patients. Conclusion. SARS-CoV-2 infection causes a wide range of symptoms both during the period of the disease and during the period of convalescence. Attention should be paid to the need for a targeted survey of patients who have undergone COVID-19 to identify the manifestations of post-COVID syndrome and conduct their medical examination with the participation of a multidisciplinary team.Copyright © Eco-Vector, 2022.
ABSTRACT
Background: In December 2019, a new infection termed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was recognised in Wuhan China. In literature only few studies exist on cutaneous manifestations in COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 phase. Hence the present study is conducted to know the most common cutaneous manifestations. Material(s) and Method(s): The present study included total of 60 patients presented with skin manifestations during COVID-19 and post COVID-19 phase of both in-patients and out-patients from October 2020 to June 2021. The patients aged more than 18yrs, tested positive for SARS CoV2 with dermatological manifestation during the infection and 3wks after testing negative for SARS CoV2 up to 3 months were included. The dermatological manifestations were recorded during the active COVID-19 infection and during post-COVID-19 period. Result(s): Among the 60 patients the common pattern was maculopapular rash in 24 patients (40%), urticaria seen in 8 patients (13.3%), chilblain seen in 4 patients (6.66%) and livedo reticularis seen in 2 patient (3.33%), during post COVID-19 were acneiform eruption seen in 16 patients (26.4%), vesicular lesions seen in 4 patients (6.66%) and lichen plan us observed in 2 patients (3.33%). Conclusion(s): There is significant association of presence of the dermatological manifestations among the patients with COVID-19 and post COVID-19 period. Study of these dermatological manifestations and their pathogenesis and their significance in human health is useful in avoiding misdiagnosis and proper treatment.Copyright © 2023, Dr Yashwant Research Labs Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Children account for a minority of cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The majority with acute infection are asymptomatic or have mild disease. Severe disease and mortality are reported in children with associated comorbidities such as complex neurodisability. Paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS;also referred to as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C)) is observed ~3-6 weeks after acute infection in an estimated 0.05% of cases. This is characterised by multiorgan involvement, and >50% of cases have myocardial dysfunction and require critical care admission for supportive care. Neurological, cardiac, gastrointestinal, renal and dermatological symptoms are all reported in acute and post-acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. To date, there is no evidence of a benefit from remdesivir, steroids or other investigative treatment in children during acute infection, and their use is recommended only on a case-by-case compassionate basis. Management of PIMS-TS is based on evidence from Kawasaki disease with immunomodulation and cardiac protection, and urgent RCT data are required. The collateral effects of the pandemic are likely to have long-term effects on children's physical and mental health.Copyright © ERS 2021.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since the first reports in November 2019, coronavirus 2 has represented a priority health problem causing severe acute respiratory syndrome and other extrapulmonary manifestations, originating a pandemic with millions of deaths. Therefore, vaccines represent the most effective means of controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Skin reactions to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have been observed. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the morphology of the cutaneous manifestations and to carry out a review on the current recommendations for their management. CLINICAL CASE: Case 1: A 25-year-old male patient who presented a morbilliform rash after the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, which remitted without sequelae at 24 hours. Case 2: A 65-year-old female patient with erythema at the puncture site 10 days after the first dose of the Modern vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 with complete remission on the 4th day after its onset. CONCLUSION(S): Some of the dermatological manifestations to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were identified as mimicking the SARS-CoV-2 infection itself. As the administration of vaccines increases, it is essential to recognize and understand their adverse effects.Copyright © 2022 Comunicaciones Cientificas Mexicanas S.A. de C.V.. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Urticarial reactions following Covid-19 vaccine were rarely reported and have a short self-limited resolution. However only one case of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) after mRNA vaccine was observed (1). Herein, we describe an original case series of patients who exhibited a CSU after Sars-Cov- 2 vaccination. Method(s): It was a retrospective case series of patients referred to the department of Clinical pharmacology of the University of Monastir for exploration of urticaria after Covid-19 vaccination., between January 2021 and January 2022. Result(s): Eight patients (8 F /5M) were included in this study. The median patient age was 36.5 years. None of them had a medical history of CSU. Urticaria was reported in 4 patients following mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 and Moderna). Viral vector vaccine (Oxford/ AstraZeneca) was offended in 2 cases and inactivated virus vaccine (Sinovac, CoronaVac) was reported in 2 others cases. The mean time interval between vaccination and the onset of urticaria was 28.5 hours. The first shot of vaccine was the mostly offended dose (n = 6). Urticaria was associated with angioedema in 5 patients after Oxford/AstraZenecavaccine (n = 2) and following mRNA vaccine (n = 2). One case of urticaria was associated with angioedema and dyspnea after the CoronaVac administration. Blood tests showed polynuclear leucocytosis in 37% of patients. Positive anti-thyroperoxidase antibodies, and elevated polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia were present in one patient 3 months after receiving BNT162b2 vaccine. Total serum IgE were high in 25% of patients following BNT162b2 and CoronaVac. All patients required antihistamines and 4 cases required intravenous betametasone. The median time to symptom resolution was 3 days but urticaria rapidly reccured throughout the entire body inspite the regular use of full dose of antihistamine. Intradermal test for the vaccine excipient as well as the offended Covid-19 vaccine was carried out in 5 patients, and were negative in all of them.Currently, all patients still has the pruritic rash daily. Conclusion(s): These cutaneous reactions seem to be particularly prolonged despite the use of symptomatic drugs, as compared with of drug induced-urticaria. Consequently, careful monitoring of urticaria over an extended period of time is needed.
ABSTRACT
Introduction (contexte de la recherche): Erythema nodosum (EN) is a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction to a variety of antigens stimuli. In fact, EN is commonly caused by a range of conditions, including infections and vaccines. EN induced by COVID-19 vaccines is rarely reported. Objectif: Herein, we report an original clinical observation of EN occurring after the first dose of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (vaxzevria), a viral vector vaccine, without recurrence after the second dose. Methodes: This case was notified on August 2021 to Tunisian National Centre of Pharmacovigilance and was analyzed according to the French updated method for the causality assessment of adverse drug reactions. Resultats: A 46-year-old woman with no medical history, presented with diffuse erythematous painful and nodular lesions, located symmetrically over her legs. Eleven days before, she had received the first dose of vaxzevria which was followed by a sudden asthenia, and oedema over her lower limbs. The patient reported no recent infectious episodes. She had no known drug allergy. Skin examination showed multiple, tender, erythematous nodules, which ranged from 3 to 4 cm in diameter located over the tibial area. Some were regressive according to biligenesis shades. Laboratory tests including a complete blood count, renal and hepatic tests and antistreptolysin O titer were carried out and were negative except an elevated c-reactive protein of 45 mg/dL. The dermatological examination found lesions on both legs to be consistent with EN and started therapy with prednisone 40 mg daily for one week, subsequently gradually tapered and suspended, with complete regression of lower limb skin lesions within 10 days. No skin biopsy was performed due to the typical clinical presentation, color evolution and a complete response to steroid therapy. The patient subsequently received the second dose after two months without the reappearance of EN. Conclusion(s): In this case the role of vaccine was suspected in front of a temporal association between the first dose of vaccine and the onset of EN and the absence of another etiology. However, the good evolution of this skin manifestation will help reassure patients in the safety of vaccine administration.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Delayed-type cutaneous adverse reactions (DCARs) are potential adverse reactions induced by COVID-19 vaccinations. Objective(s): To investigate the immune pathomechanism of COVID-19 vaccination-related DCARs. Method(s): We conducted a prospective observational study on patients with COVID-19 vaccine-DCARs and tolerant subjects. Serum immune molecules and high-parameter blood cell analysis were analyzed.In vitro lymphocyte activation test (LAT) was performed to evaluate the causative allergens of COVID-19 vaccines for DCARs. Result(s): We enrolled 103 patients with COVID-19 vaccine-DCARs. Patients suffered from DCARs mainly after the first vaccination dose (75.7%). Compared to the tolerant controls, patients with DCARs showed significantly higher serum levels of IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17A, IL-18, IFN-gamma, IP-10, MIG, granulysin, PARC and TARC(P=3.40x10-5-0.028). High-parameter flow cytometric analysis revealed significant increased CD4+Th2, CD4+Th17, CD4+Th22, CD4+LAG-3+, CD4+CD103+Trm, Tfr, CD8+CXCR3+, CD8+Tc2, CD8+Tc17 and CD8+CTLA4+cell populations relative to total DCARs and specific phenotypes(P=0.001-0.042). In vitro LAT assays measuring IFN-gamma, granulysin, and granzyme B showed that patients with AZD1222-DCARs were significantly reactive to polysorbate 80 and spike protein;BNT162b2-DCARs were significantly reactive to polyethene glycol(PEG) 2000, and spike protein;while mRNA-1273-DCARs were significantly reactive to PEG 2000, tris and spike protein(P<0.05). Conclusion(s): We demonstrated a distinct immune response related to variable clinical phenotypes involved in the immune mechanism of COVID-19 vaccines-DCARs. In vivo LAT assays showed that COVID-19 vaccines excipients and spike protein were potential major components related to the COVID-19 vaccines-induced DCARs.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: A variety of skin conditions are reported in association with COVID-19. Among these clinical patterns, urticarial lesions are described. We present a case of new-onset urticaria in an adult patient with mild COVID-19. In addition, we performed a comprehensive structured literature search to evaluate the temporal relationship between COVID-19 and urticarial manifestations and their duration. Method(s): This case report presents an adult patient with new-onset urticaria and confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, assessed according to international guidelines. A systematic review was conducted for relevant studies published in Pubmed/Medline database, between January 2020 and January 2022, using specific keywords for clinical and temporal features of skin lesions. Result(s): A 28-year- old male with a 24-hour history of fever and headache presented new-onset urticarial lesions. In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, infection with SARS-CoV- 2 was suspected, and a PCR test detected viral RNA in a nasopharynx sample confirming the diagnosis in this patient. Other clinical manifestations and abnormal laboratory findings were not detected. A diagnosis of SARS-CoV- 2 infection-associated urticaria was established. The urticarial rash improved with oral new-generation H1 antihistamines and was remitted in 5 days. The outpatient treatment did not include systemic corticosteroid and antiviral therapy. Out of 3542 articles published in PubMed on cutaneous manifestations linked to COVID-19/ SARS-CoV- 2 infection, 53 met the criteria of assessing urticaria in these conditions. From these, 30 were case reports, 13 were case series and 10 were cohort studies. From 273 patients reported with urticaria, only 53 had a clear mention of a positive antigen or nucleic acid amplification viral test. Urticaria preceded the onset of respiratory/systemic COVID-19 symptoms in 12 patients, appeared at the same time in 81 patients, and as a late manifestation in 45 patients. For 135 patients, the timing was not specified. Urticarial lesions were remitted between several hours to 12 weeks, either spontaneously or with symptomatic treatment. Conclusion(s): Based on reported cases, urticaria may be associated with COVID-19. There is a need for more relevant studies regarding urticaria in these infectious conditions, with detailed data on clinical pattern, time of onset, duration, severity, need for specific treatment and prognosis.
ABSTRACT
Background: Although hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids are rare in the general population, they are not uncommon in high-risk patients who receive repeated doses of them. It is known that delayed reactions are more common than immediate ones. Atopic dermatitis is a risk factor for the development of allergic contact dermatitis from topical corticosteroids. Patients can also develop hypersensitivity reactions to nasal, inhaled, oral and parenteral corticosteroids. Method(s): We reported one case of a 72-year- old man with history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GOLD 4) and atopic dermatitis, who experienced a morbilliform rash after intravenous hydrocortisone administration during his hospital admission for SARS-COV- 2 infection. Since 1995 he had experienced several late skin reactions with corticosteroids and after performing an allergy study he was diagnosed of delayed hypersensitivity to corticosteroids with good tolerance for intravenous hydrocortisone and inhaled mometasone. Closed patch tests were performed with hydrocortisone with immediate and late lectures of 48-96 hours. We also performed a controlled intravenous challenge with hydrocortisone (200 mg) as well as an oral challenge with deflazacort (30 mg) under surveillance in the intensive care unit. Result(s): Patch tests were negative and intravenous hydrocortisone challenge went positive after 48 hours with the same previous skin reaction. Our patient showed a good tolerance to deflazacort. Conclusion(s): Choosing an alternative corticosteroid is pivotal to the patient's safety and also decreases the worry of developing an allergic reaction. This evaluation becomes especially important in high-risk groups where steroids are a life-saving treatment. Baeck et al. classified corticosteroids according to their chemical structure, improving treatment options and recommendations that can be prescribed. Nevertheless, discordance continues to be observed between the results of patch tests and the patient's tolerance to various commercial preparations. In order to provide alternative treatments, it is advisable to perform exposure tests with corticosteroids from a group other than the one the patient is sensitized to. Deflazacort could be an alternative in emergency cases. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID 19 infection in children is characterized by a clinical polymorphism, cutaneous manifestations being present in a significant percentage. Data reported in the literature described cutaneous manifestations in the form of measles rash, acral lesions, livedo reticularis and racemosa, acute urticaria, non-pruritic papulo-vesicular rash but also multisystemic inflammatory syndrome. Recognition of these lesions may suggest a diagnosis of acute SARS-COV2 infection, and when anamnestically detected, the rash provides evidence of a possible MIS-C in children that may quickly progress unfavorably. In some cases, newborns who belong to mothers affected by the new coronavirus have a temporary maculopapular rash, with a diffuse appearance, which disappears spontaneously but with an impact on the fetus. Method(s): In conducting this retrospective study we used data extracted from 320 medical records of pediatric patients diagnosed with acute SARS-COV 2 infection, in the Clinical Emergency Hospital for Children 'Sf. Maria' Iasi, Romania, between January 2020 -January 2021. Subsequently, the cases with cutaneous manifestations detected at the time of admission but also those present prior to admission and reported by the parents were selected. There were 3 pregnant patients who met the above criteria. Result(s): Cutaneous manifestations were present in 31% of patients. These had a favorable outcome in most cases. There were 7 cases of MIS-C in which the outcome was unfavorable (2 cases) and slowly favorable (5 cases). In these situations, the cutaneous manifestations lasted longer and in most cases, correlated with the severity of the disease. In pediatric pregnant patients, the outcome was favorable and did not have a negative impact on the newborn. Conclusion(s): Cutaneous manifestations are common in children with acute SARS-COV 2 infection and these appear to be represented by the location of the virus in the superficial blood vessels. The appearance of livedo-type lesions has been associated with microthrombotic processes and have been less frequently found but with a slowly favorable outcome. The diagnosis of MIS-C represents an emergency, cutaneous manifestations playing an important role in the early detection and treatment of these children.
ABSTRACT
Background. Viruses are thought to play a role in triggering juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIM), which include juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), juvenile polymyositis (JPM), and overlap myositis. There is growing evidence that infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can trigger autoimmune diseases in genetically susceptible individuals, including idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Studies have shown similarities between SARS-CoV-2 infection and anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-related dermatomyositis, suggesting possible shared underlying autoimmune and/or inflammatory mechanisms. To date, there are few studies describing individual cases of JIIM following SARS-CoV-2 infection, and, to our knowledge, none have explored the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the clinical presentation of JIIM. In this study, we aim to investigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on JIIM by comparing the onset of new JIIM cases, as well as clinical and laboratory characteristics at disease onset, in patients diagnosed before and after onset of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic (COVID 19). Methods. Patients diagnosed with JIIM prior to age 19 at The Children's Hospital at Montefiore were eligible for study inclusion. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, as well as evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2, were collected retrospectively by manual chart review. Patients were grouped into pre-COVID 19 (defined as prior to January 1, 2020) and post-COVID 19 (defined as January 1, 2020, or later). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize each variable. Given the small sample size, non-parametric testing was performed using Fischer's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results. Forty-four patients were included in the analysis (Table I). Thirty-four patients (77.3%) were diagnosed pre-COVID 19 and ten patients (22.7%) were diagnosed post-COVID 19. Of the ten patients diagnosed post-COVID 19, five (50%) had known exposure to or infection with SARS-CoV-2. Patients diagnosed with JIIM post-COVID 19 were more likely to be of non-Hispanic Black or Asian descent (p=0.041), develop disease at an older age (p=0.009), and present with non-classic cutaneous manifestations (as opposed to classic findings of Gottron's papules/sign or Heliotrope rash) (p=0.031), despite similar frequencies of JDM versus overlap myositis. While presence of muscle weakness did not differ between the groups, patients diagnosed post-COVID 19 tended to have more severe weakness, though results were not statistically significant. Interestingly, despite delays to diagnosis reported during the pandemic, there was no difference between time from symptom onset to diagnosis. Conclusion. This is the first study to explore the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the clinical presentation of JIIM. In our center, we found that patients diagnosed with JIIM after COVID-19 were more likely to be racial minorities, older at onset, and present with non-classic cutaneous manifestations. While there were no significant differences in myositis specific or associated antibodies, patients diagnosed post-COVID 19 did not have complete autoantibody investigation performed at the time of this study. Clinicians should consider JIIM even in the absence of classic cutaneous manifestations, particularly in the post-COVID 19 era. Patients should be followed longitudinally to explore long-term impacts of SARS-CoV-2 on JIIM. Further investigation is warranted to identify the mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 impacts JIIM and how these differ from the effects of other viruses.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19 infection is a disease caused by the type 2 coronavirus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) that affects the respiratory mucosa and all those organs that present the type 2 angiotensin receptor (ACE2), within them the skin. Several authors have mentioned the importance of reporting and carrying out databases on skin lesions caused by this virus, since it is related to the detection, severity and prognosis of the systemic condition. Material(s) and Method(s): A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was carried out on the cases of patients who presented dermatological manifestations due to COVID-19, registered in the physical database of the National Specialized Hospital of Villa Nueva, Guatemala, from January 1st to December 31, 2021. Result(s): A total of 144 patients presented dermatological manifestations due to COVID-19, which were: acral lesions (42%), rash (21%), subcutaneous emphysema (12%), oral mucosal lesions (7%), necrosis (6%), erythema multiforme (5%), telogen effluvium (2%), vesicular lesions (2%), urticaria (1%), pityriasis rosea Gibert (1%) and livedo-type lesion (1%). A statistically significant association (p = 0,00) was found in patients who presented dermatological manifestations with vasculonecrotic damage as they were more likely to suffer from severe to critical disease (OR 2,91;95% CI 1063-3083). Conclusion(s): Early identification of cutaneous semiology is essential for timely management of complications associated with COVID-19 disease.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.